Dr. Creed Bratton performs a simulation of two new proteins that he discovered. The simulation does not include any water molecules, but it does consider electrostatic interactions, sterics, solvent drag, and the random forces that often affect small particles. The simulation doesn't account for protein flexibility. Dr. Bratton just wants to know how the two proteins tend to diffuse towards one another. What kind of simulation did he likely perform? (Hint: Don't use any abbreviations.)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This question describes a simulation setup and asks you to identify the likely type of simulation without using abbreviations.
First, consider what is included in the model: electrostatic interactions, sterics (shapes and excluded volume), solvent drag (friction from the surrounding medium), and random forces acting on small particles. Water molecules themselves are not represented explicitly, and the internal flexibility of the proteins is not accounted for. The goal is to observe how two proteins diffuse toward one another rather than to track detailed atomic motions inside each protein.
Second, recall common simulation approaches and what they emphasize. Molecular dynamics simulations typically include explicit or implicit solvent and can capture detailed protein flexibility and inertia; they often involve many atoms and time scales where internal conformational changes matter. Monte Carlo simulations focus on sampling configurations rather than following time evolution with random thermal forces, and they are not primarily designed to model diffusion trajectories under damping and random forces.
Third, the described combination—overdamped motion with random thermal forces, explicit pairwise interactions (electrostatic and steric) governing the forces, and the absence of explicit solvent and protein flexibility—points to a Brownian dynamics framework. In Brownian dynamics, the motion is dominated by frictional drag and random (thermally driven) forces, while the deterministic forces arise from the interaction potentials between particles. This matches the intent to study diffusion toward each other rather than detailed conformational dynamics.
Fourth, evaluate why other possible labels would be less appropriate. If inertia were important, as in classic molecular dynamics, the simulation would be sensitive to mass and would typically model solvent explicitly or carry inertial terms, which is not indicated here. If the goal were purely sampling configurations without time evolution, Monte Carlo methods would be more suitable, but the description emphasizes diffusion behavior and random forces over time, aligning with dynamics-based diffusion rather than sampling alone. Finally, the absence of water and flexibility strongly suggests a coarse-grained, overdamped approach focused on inter-particle interactions and stochastic motion rather than full-atom, all-atom dynamics.
In summary, the combination of no explicit solvent, inclusion of random thermal forces, solvent drag, electrostatic and steric interactions, and the goal of observing diffusion toward one another best fits a Brownian dynamics simulation. The setup implies an overdamped, diffusion-dominated model where inertia and internal flexibility are neglected while random motion and interparticle forces drive the behavior.

2254 BIOSC 1544 SEC1000 Exam #3- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler