Questions
Questions

ECON_104B_001_25S Chapter 13 Practice Problems -- Multiple-Choice

Single choice

Bertrand duopolists, Firm 1 and Firm 2, face inverse market demand . Both have marginal cost, . The equilibrium price in the market will be

Options
A.$10
B.$20
C.$30
D.$40
Question Image
View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
First, note the core setup: two Bertrand competitors with homogeneous goods face the market demand P = 50 − Q and have marginal cost MC = 20. In a standard Bertrand duopoly with identical products and constant marginal cost, undercutting the rival’s price by any positive amount drives the market winner to capture the entire demand at a price that minimizes the other firm’s profitable undercutting opportun......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

Thermal Inc. (TI) is considering two possible locations for a new coal-fired power plant: one adjacent to Mine 1 and the other adjacent to Mine 2, which are 100 km apart. The marginal cost (MC) of production is $3 per ton for Mine 1 and $5 per ton for Mine 2. TI can purchase coal from either mine, but the transportation cost is $2 per ton per 100 km. Suppose TI locates its plant next to Mine 1 (perhaps by mistake) and invests heavily in infrastructure there (a sunk cost). What is the likely Bertrand price in whole number that Mine 1 would charge TI, assuming TI pays the one-way transportation cost, if any, for coal? (Note: The price refers to the one charged by the mines, which may be influenced by transportation costs.)

Two gas stations next to each other set prices simultaneously. They both compete in price non-cooperatively (i.e., no tacit collusion). This pricing game is played once and then the world ends. We denote the price of gasoline per gallon station A and B charges as p_A and p_B, respectively. Suppose you are the manager of station A, and you observed the competitor (i.e., station B)'s sudden price decrease by 5 cents per gallon. Assuming no (tacit) collusion, what would be your best response to your competitor’s price decrease? Namely, what is your profit-maximizing behavior given station B has decreased its gas price per gallon?  

Now consider a Bertrand game with two firms: Firm A and Firm B.  The market demand is equal to P=280-Q, where Q is number of units demanded. Consumers will purchase the good from the firm who offers the lower price. If the firms offer the same price, each firm will sell half of the units that are demanded. The marginal cost is constant and equal to $40 for both firms. The firms have zero fixed costs. What is the equilibrium price in this market?

Two gas stations next to each other set prices simultaneously. They both compete in price non-cooperatively (i.e., no tacit collusion). This pricing game is played once and then the world ends. We denote the price of gasoline per gallon station A and B charges as p_A and p_B, respectively. Suppose you are the manager of station A, and you observed the competitor (i.e., station B)'s sudden price decrease by 5 cents per gallon. Assuming no (tacit) collusion, what would be your best response to your competitor’s price decrease? Namely, what is your profit-maximizing behavior given station B has decreased its gas price per gallon?  

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!