假设有一个 blocksworld 域，其中包含一些积木和一张桌子。一块积木可以位于桌上或另一块积木上。On 关系指定哪块积木位于什么东西之上。Move 动作将一块积木从一个位置移到另一个位置。In_Gripper 关系指定积木位于抓手中。

考虑以下状态：

当前状态：block(b1), block(b2), block(b3), block(b4), On(b1,b2), On(b2,table), On(b3,table), On(b4,b3)

Suppose there is a blocksworld domain that contains some blocks and a table. A block can be on top of the table or on another block. On relation specifies which block is on top of what. Move action moves a block from one location to another. In_Gripper relationship specifies that the block is in the gripper.

Consider these states:

Current state: block(b1), block(b2), block(b3), block(b4), On(b1,b2), On(b2,table), On(b3,table), On(b4,b3)

Goal state: On(b4,table), On(b3,b1)

In order for a state to be a landmark, which proposition must be contained in the state?

Question

假设有一个 blocksworld 域，其中包含一些积木和一张桌子。一块积木可以位于桌上或另一块积木上。On 关系指定哪块积木位于什么东西之上。Move 动作将一块积木从一个位置移到另一个位置。In_Gripper 关系指定积木位于抓手中。

考虑以下状态：

当前状态：block(b1), block(b2), block(b3), block(b4), On(b1,b2), On(b2,table), On(b3,table), On(b4,b3)

Suppose there is a blocksworld domain that contains some blocks and a table. A block can be on top of the table or on another block. On relation specifies which block is on top of what. Move action moves a block from one location to another. In_Gripper relationship specifies that the block is in the gripper.

Consider these states:

Current state: block(b1), block(b2), block(b3), block(b4), On(b1,b2), On(b2,table), On(b3,table), On(b4,b3)

Goal state: On(b4,table), On(b3,b1)

In order for a state to be a landmark, which proposition must be contained in the state?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In a blocks world with On relations, Move actions, and In_Gripper relations, given the current state and a goal state, identify which proposition must appear in any landmark state.

Option under consideration: In_Gripper(b4)

Analysis of each option:
- In_Gripper(b4): This proposition states that block b4 is in the gripper. Why it could be a landmark: To achieve the goal On(b4,table) starting from On(b4,b3), you typically need to remove b4 from being supported by b3 and place it onto the table. In most blocks-world implementations, moving a block from one position to another (e.g., from on a block to the table) requires first lifting it into the gripper (In_Gripper) so that it can be moved independently. If every valid plan to reach the goal must eventually place b4 into the table, there is a point in the plan where b4 must be held by the gripper before the move to the table can occur. Hence, In_Gripper(b4) tends to be a necessary condition in all solutions, making it a plausible landmark.

- Other potential options (not present in the provided set): If there were other candidate landmarks, we would evaluate them similarly by checking whether they must hold at some point along every valid plan to reach the goal. For example, a proposition like On(b3,b1) might or might not be a landmark depending on whether there exist valid sequences where b3 is moved onto b1 without first being in the gripper; however, since the current question only provides one option, we focus on the given candidate.

Rationale for why this proposition is plausible as a landmark rather than optional: In many planning formulations, actions that move a block from being supported by another block to a new support (e.g., moving b4 from on b3 to on the table) require that the block be in the agent’s grasp (In_Gripper) to effect the removal. If a plan ever reaches On(b4,table) as a goal state, there must be a transition where b4 is picked up (In_Gripper) prior to placing it on the table, making In_Gripper(b4) a strong candidate for a landmark.

Note on completeness and alternatives: The provided options contain only In_Gripper(b4). If there were other propositions offered as options, we would assess each one for necessity across all valid plans. We would also consider whether a landmark must be true at some point (not necessarily at the initial state or final state) and whether it is truly unavoidable given the initial state and the allowed actions.

Summary in plain terms: The key reasoning is that to move b4 from being on b3 to being on the table, the block typically has to be in the gripper first. Therefore, In_Gripper(b4) is a reasonable candidate for a landmark, and among the provided options, it is the one under consideration.

2025FallB-X-CSE571-78760 模块 7: 顺序决策知识检查 Module 7: Sequential Decision-Making Knowledge Check

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In STRIPS Planning the "threatening operator" must come ________________________.

Which statement is FALSE when ignoring delete lists in Sokoban

PDDL 中的下列哪种操作方案可在初始状态下产生适用的操作？ Init(Tire(A)∧Flat(A)∧Puncture(A)∧Tire(B))

Which of the following action schemes in PDDL yield an applicable action in the initial state 𝐼 𝑛 𝑖 𝑡 ( 𝑇 𝑖 𝑟 𝑒 ( 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝐹 𝑙 𝑎 𝑡 ( 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑃 𝑢 𝑛 𝑐 𝑡 𝑢 𝑟 𝑒 ( 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑇 𝑖 𝑟 𝑒 ( 𝐵 ) ) ?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler

2025FallB-X-CSE571-78760 模块 7: 顺序决策 知识检查 Module 7: Sequential Decision-Making Knowledge Check