What is a fundamental difference between typical time series data and cross-sectional data that violates a standard OLS assumption?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about a fundamental difference between typical time series data and cross-sectional data that breaches a standard OLS assumption.
Option 1: 'Time series observations are typically not independently drawn (violates MLR.2).' This is a core issue with time series: observations are often correlated over time (serial correlation or autocorrelation), which means the independence assumption (MLR.2) is violated, potentially biasing standard errors.
Option 2: 'Time series data always exhibits perfect collinearity (violates MLR.3).' Perfect collinearity is a problem for estimating the model when a regressor is a perfect linear combination of others; this is not a general or fundamental feature of time series versus cross-sectional data, and it is not a universal property of time series data.
Option 3: 'Time series errors never have a zero conditional mean (violates MLR.4).' In OLS, the zero conditional mean of errors is a key assumption; time series data can have heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation, but the statement that errors never have zero conditional mean is incorrect as a general rule. The assumption concerns E[u|X]=0, not a time-series-specific outcome that errors never have zero conditional mean.
Option 4: 'Time series data cannot be linear in parameters (violates MLR.1).' The linearity in parameters (MLR.1) is a property of the model specification, not something inherently violated by time series data; many time series models are linear in parameters, so this claim misstates the nature of time series modeling.
In summary, the essential distinction here is the dependence structure: time series data tend to display autocorrelation, which clashes with the independence requirement of MLR.2, making Option 1 the correct characterization among the choices provided.

What is a fundamental difference between typical time series data and cross-sectional data that violates a standard OLS assumption?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Autocovariance in residuals of time series regression indicates that OLS should never be applied to estimate coefficients

A classical ordinary least squares (OLS) cannot be applied if the dependent variable exhibits autocovariance

If the d-statistic in the Durbin-Watson Test is 0.5,

In a sample of size 25, you calculate a sample autocorrelation to be 0.35. You need to know if this autocorrelation is statistically significant at the 5% level of significance. Is it? (Keep in mind that the standard error of a sample autocorrelation is 1/(N^0.5), where N is the sample size.

Consider the following time-series process given by where denotes the lag operator and . What is the lag 3 autocorrelation of , ?

Consider the following time-series process given by where denotes the lag operator and . What is the lag 1 autocorrelation of , ?

Consider the following time-series process given by 𝑦 𝑡 = ( 1 + 0.5 𝐿 + 0.6 𝐿 2 ) 𝜀 𝑡 where 𝐿 denotes the lag operator and 𝜀 𝑡 ∼ 𝑊 𝑁 ( 0 , 3 ) . What is the lag 3 autocorrelation of 𝑦 𝑡 , 𝜌 ( 3 ) ?

Consider the following time-series process given by 𝑦 𝑡 = ( 1 + 0.6 𝐿 + 0.1 𝐿 2 ) 𝜀 𝑡 where 𝐿 denotes the lag operator and 𝜀 𝑡 ∼ 𝑊 𝑁 ( 0 , 8 ) . What is the lag 1 autocorrelation of 𝑦 𝑡 , 𝜌 ( 1 ) ?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler