Consider an investor who lives 2 periods (t and t+1). She has income et in the first period and et+1 in the second period. The investor buys θ shares of an asset at price pt in the first period, and receives an uncertain payoff xt+1=pt+1+dt+1 in the second period. Her investment decision is thus described by the following maximization problem:
max
θ[u(ct)+β𝔼t(u(ct+1))].
Assuming that the utility function is u(ct)=
1

2
(ct−α)2 what is the equation for the price of the asset in period t as a function of tomorrow’s payoffs?

Question

Consider an investor who lives 2 periods (t and t+1). She has income et in the first period and et+1 in the second period. The investor buys θ shares of an asset at price pt in the first period, and receives an uncertain payoff xt+1=pt+1+dt+1 in the second period. Her investment decision is thus described by the following maximization problem:
max
θ[u(ct)+β𝔼t(u(ct+1))].
Assuming that the utility function is u(ct)=
1

2
(ct−α)2 what is the equation for the price of the asset in period t as a function of tomorrow’s payoffs?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the setup to anchor the analysis: the investor with utility u(c) = 1/2 (c − α)^2 chooses θ to maximize the present value of utility, given ct = et − p t θ and ct+1 = et+1 − p t θ + x t+1 − p t+1 θ? (Note: payoffs in period t+1 depend on the asset price and the payoff dt+1, with xt+1 = pt+1 + dt+1.) The question asks for the price p t as a function of tomorrow’s payoffs, derived from a first-order condition (FOC) in this quadratic utility setting.

Option A: pt = E t [ β ( ct+1 − α ) xt+1 / ( ct − α ) ]
- This form mixes ct+1 and ct in a ratio with α and multiplies by E t[β xt+1]. The structure resembles a ratio of marginal utilities evaluated at two consecutive periods, but a clean FOC for a quadratic utility typically yields a linear relationship in the payoff xt+1 when solving for pt. The division by (ct − α) in the denominator creates a potential division-by-zero issue and does not mirror the standard Euler equation form derived from the quadratic utility given. This option seems structurally off because the expected payoff xt+1 is being scaled by a ratio of marginal utilities that itself depends on ct and ct+1, which would complicate rather than linearize the price expression.

Option B: pt = E t [ β ( ct+1 / ct − α ) xt+1 ]
- Here, the term inside the expectation is β times a ratio ( ct+1 / ct ) minus α, all multiplying xt+1. The expression ct+1/ct is not the standard marginal-utility ratio arising in the Euler equation for a quadratic utility with additive separable consumption across periods. Including −α outside the ratio further disrupts the usual linear relationship with xt+1. This option seems dimensionally inconsistent with the typical asset-pricing Euler equation, and the exact placement of α does not align with the quadratic utility clouding the multiplier on xt+1. Overall, this option does not reflect the conventional derivation path.

Option C: pt = E t [ β ( ct+1 − α ) / ( ct − α ) · xt+1 ]
- This expression features a clean ratio of marginal utilities: ( ct+1 − α ) is proportional to marginal utility in period 2, and ( ct − α ) is proportional to marginal utility in period 1, with the quadratic u(c) leading to marginal utility proportional to ( c − α ). The Euler equation for a two-period model with certainty equivalent structure under a quadratic utility often yields p t equals the expected discounted payoff times the ratio of marginal utilities across periods, precisely like [ (ct+1 − α) / (ct − α) ] times xt+1, all multiplied by β and expectation E t. This matches the standard intuition: the price today equals the expected discounted payoff weighted by how much the marginal utility changes from today to tomorrow. The presence of xt+1 as the payoff component aligns with the second-period random payoff, and the β factor is the time discount. The structure is consistent with a first-order condition derived from max θ [ u(ct) + β E t u(ct+1) ] with u(c) = 1/2 (c − α)^2.

Option D: pt = E t [ β ct+1 × ct × xt+1 ]
- This is a highly nonlinear product of ct+1, ct, and xt+1, lacking the subtractive α terms that naturally arise in the marginal utilities for a quadratic utility function of the form (c − α)^2. It would imply a price that depends on the product of consumptions in both periods, which is not consistent with the Euler-equation derivation for this utility specification. Moreover, there is no division by ct or ct+1, which would be expected if we were expressing the ratio of marginal utilities (both containing ct − α and ct+1 − α). This option therefore misplaces the mathematical structure that stems from the FOC.

Option E: pt = E t [ β ( ct+1 − α )^2 / ( ct − α )^2 × xt+1 ]
- This option introduces squared marginal utilities, effectively squaring the ( ct − α ) terms. While the square could appear if one were dealing with a second-order condition or a more complex utility transformation, the standard linearization in the Euler equation for this quadratic utility does not yield squared ratios; it yields a simple ratio of first powers: ( ct+1 − α ) / ( ct − α ). The squared form exaggerates sensitivity to consumption levels and is not consistent with the straightforward derivative of u(c) = 1/2 ( c − α )^2 with respect to c. Hence this option misrepresents the derivative structure that would arise from the FOC.

Putting the pieces together, the option that matches the conventional Euler-equation derivation for this setup is the one that uses the marginal-utility ratio ( ct+1 − α ) / ( ct − α ) multiplied by xt+1 and scaled by β under the conditional expectation E t. This corresponds to Option C.

BU.232.630.W6.SP25 Quiz 2 solutions

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler