Questions
Questions

PHI 007Y 001 SS1 2025 Week 5 Quiz

Multiple choice

X agreed to sexual activity with Y.  Therefore, X has a contract with Y for sexual activity.    Pineau argues that this argument is invalid. Adding which of the following premises would make it a valid (not sound!) argument (select all that apply):

View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The question asks which additional premises would render Pineau's argument valid (though not necessarily sound). We start by restating the core claim: 'X agreed to sexual activity with Y' implies 'X has a contract with Y for sexual activity.' The validity of this inference depends on how we connect agreements to contracts. Option 1: 'All agreements are contracts.' If this premise were added, then from 'X agreed to sexual a......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!