Consider the following argument:

Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military. Therefore, he's probably a democrat, and moreover, he'll probably vote against Proposition S.

Now indicate which of the following captures the best way to prepare the above argument for diagramming:

Question

Consider the following argument:

Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military. Therefore, he's probably a democrat, and moreover, he'll probably vote against Proposition S.

Now indicate which of the following captures the best way to prepare the above argument for diagramming:

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The task asks us to evaluate which of the provided options best captures how to diagram the given argument. To do this, I will restate the question and each option, then analyze each one in turn.

Restated question:
- Consider the argument: Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military. Therefore, he's probably a democrat, and moreover, he'll probably vote against Proposition S. Which option best captures the way to diagram this argument?

Option analyses:

Option 1: "(1) {Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military.} Therefore, (2) [he's probably a democrat,] and moreover, (3) (he'll probably vote against Proposition S.)"
- This option places the first premise inside braces, then literally labels the other two statements as separate numbered items with brackets and parentheses. The use of both braces and brackets is visually cluttered and inconsistent with common diagramming practice, which usually aims for a clean, uniform representation of premises and the conclusion. The word Therefore is placed before the second premise in a way that suggests a direct connect-from-premise to conclusion structure, but the surrounding punctuation mix (curly braces, square brackets, parentheses) makes the diagramming unclear and inconsistent. Overall, this option introduces extraneous punctuation that does not clearly standardize the diagram’s connectors.

Option 2: "(1) \"Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military.\" [Therefore,] (2) \"he's probably a democrat,\" {and moreover,} (3) \"he'll probably vote against Proposition S.\""
- This version uses a bracketed \'Therefore,\' after the first premise, which marks the transition to the next statements. It then presents the second and third statements with mixed punctuation: square brackets for the connective \"Therefore,\" and curly braces around \"and moreover,\". The placement of \"Therefore\" as a separate indicator is not as clean as placing the connective before the next premise or as part of a unified diagrammatic relation. The inconsistent use of brackets and braces around connectives makes it harder to parse the intended relationships between premises and conclusion.

Option 3: "(1) \"Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military.\" (Therefore,) (2) \"he's probably a democrat,\" {and moreover,} (3) \"he'll probably vote against Proposition S.\""
- This option attaches (Therefore,) directly to the first premise with a parenthetical, which clearly signals a connective, and then introduces the second and third statements with a curly-brace clause for \"and moreover,\". The punctuation shows a consistent relation: a premise followed by a connective indicator, then subsequent premises. However, the placement of the comma after \"Therefore,\" inside parentheses may feel stylistically awkward, and the mixture of parentheses and braces still introduces mild inconsistency in how connectives are presented. Still, it reads more coherently than Option 1 and option 2 because the connective (Therefore,) directly attaches to the preceding premise without superfluous outer punctuation.

Option 4: "(1) \"Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military.\" {Therefore,} (2) \"he's probably a democrat,\" {and moreover,} (3) \"he'll probably vote against Proposition S.\""
- This option uses curly braces around the connectives \"Therefore,\" and \"and moreover,\" in a way that visually marks the connectors as a separate layer of the diagram, while keeping the premises themselves in quotation marks with consistent numbering. The sequencing clearly presents the first premise, then a connective marking with \"Therefore,\", followed by the second premise with another connective marker \"and moreover,\" before the third premise. This structure aligns well with standard diagramming conventions that separate the main statements from the connective signals, making the relationships easier to follow. The punctuation remains uniform and the flow from premise to connective to next premise is straightforward.

Summary of reasoning across options:
- Option 1 is visually cluttered and mixes multiple types of brackets, which can obscure the logical linkages.
- Option 2 introduces inconsistent placement of the connective indicators, using multiple bracket types in a way that can confuse the reader about which parts are connected by which connective.
- Option 3 presents a relatively coherent flow with a clear attachment of the first connective (Therefore,) to the first premise, and uses a secondary connective (and moreover,) for linking the subsequent premise, though the combination of punctuation (parentheses and braces) remains somewhat uneven.
- Option 4 offers the most consistent and readable diagramming approach by enclosing the connective words in braces while keeping the premises clearly numbered and quoted, which helps separate the content of the premises from the markers that indicate how they relate.

Concluding thoughts:
- The goal of diagramming is to make the logical structure explicit and easy to scan. A diagram that cleanly marks the premise-connector-premise chain with stable punctuation reduces ambiguity and enhances interpretability. In light of this, Option 4 best achieves that goal by providing a uniform, readable layout where each connective is clearly signposted without introducing tangled punctuation.

CRITICAL THINKING & COMP PHIL 1600-02 (90212) Midterm Exam 2, Section IV (Corresponds to Homework Set XV)

Consider the following argument: Smith favors the idea of allowing heterosexuals in the military. Therefore, he's probably a democrat, and moreover, he'll probably vote against Proposition S. Now indicate which of the following captures the best way to prepare the above argument for diagramming:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler