Which dispute resolution method description best defines advisory arbitration?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating what the question asks: Which dispute resolution method description best defines advisory arbitration?
Option provided: 'A third party decides who is right and who is not and issues a non-binding decision'.
First, consider what advisory arbitration entails: it involves a neutral third party who analyzes the dispute and provides a recommendation or advisory opinion; importantly, this advisory output is non-binding, meaning the parties are not obligated to follow it and it does not create enforceable rights or obligations on its own.
Next, evaluate the key components of the statement: a third party is involved (the neutral advisor/arbitrator), the advisor determines which party is right or wrong (offer of a determination or assessment), and the decision is non-binding (not enforceable unless the parties accept it or it is incorporated into an agreement).
With advisory arbitration, there is typically no binding resolution imposed by the arbitrator; rather, the advisory opinion guides the parties and may inform negotiations or a court process if they choose to pursue it further.
Now, consider potential misconceptions that could arise if options were present: a) If the option suggested a binding decision, it would describe binding arbitration rather than advisory arbitration. b) If it claimed mandatory compliance or a punitive outcome, it would misrepresent the voluntary, advisory nature. c) If it framed the third party as merely a facilitator without giving opinions on who is right, it would align more with a mediator role rather than an arbitrator's advisory opinion.
Since we only have the single described option to evaluate, the core alignment rests on the combination of a neutral third party delivering a non-binding determination or recommendation, which captures the essence of advisory arbitration’s non-binding advisory function.
In summary, the statement emphasizes a neutral assessor providing a non-binding result, which corresponds to the non-binding advisory characteristic of advisory arbitration, while avoiding assertions of enforceable rights or mandatory outcomes that would conflict with its advisory status.

37:575:312:E6 & 38:578:515:E6 CONFLCT IN WRK PLACE Midterm Exam (Undergraduate Students) TURN ON YOUR CAMERA

Which dispute resolution method description best defines advisory arbitration?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Arbitrators do not have the ability to impose a settlement.

Unlike ordinary court rulings, arbitration proceedings and arbitral awards are confidential.

In arbitral proceedings, the applicable procedural law may be chosen by the parties.

The repeat player effect gives employees a considerable advantage over employers in arbitration.

In the judicial approach to decision-making, the arbitrator adheres strictly to predetermined criteria and is not influenced by the bargaining power or preference of the parties.

In arbitral proceedings, the applicable procedural law may be chosen by the parties.

The Arbitrator ruled in favor of the employer (Respondent).

In what year did the Arbitrator issue the arbitration award?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler