True or False: Getting your ankles taped is cheaper over a course of a season as compared to ankle bracing.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: True or False: Getting your ankles taped is cheaper over a course of a season as compared to ankle bracing.

Option 1: True. This would claim that taping is the cheaper option across a season. The reasoning behind deeming this option incorrect is that taped ankles typically incur recurring costs: each taping session requires materials (tape) and often time from a clinician or athletic trainer, and taping may be needed for every practice or game, leading to accumulating expenses. Additionally, frequent taping can increase labor costs and may necessitate more frequent re-taping if the tape loosens or wears out, which can add up over a season. There is also potential for decreased reliability if the tape loses its hold, possibly resulting in injuries or more medical costs, which contradicts the idea of cheaper, consistent protection. Overall, while tape upfront might be inexpensive, the ongoing nature of taping across many events tends to make it less cost-efficient over a full season compared to a one-time or reusable brace.

Option 2: False. This option asserts that the statement in Option 1 is not true. Here we recognize that ankle braces (or lace-up ankle braces) generally provide continuous, reusable protection for an entire season with a single initial purchase cost plus occasional maintenance, rather than a per-use expense. Braces can be worn during most practices and games without needing a clinician to reapply them each time, reducing labor costs and ongoing material costs relative to taping. While braces vary in price, the cumulative cost over a season is often lower than the sum of repeated taping sessions and materials. From a budgeting perspective, braces shift most of the expense into the upfront cost, but they remove the recurring per-event expenses, making them a more economical choice over time in many scenarios.

Option 1 vs Option 2 comparison. The core misunderstanding in Option 1 is treating a single, low upfront cost (tape) as durable protection across a season without accounting for repetitive application costs and potential time costs for each session. The key point addressing Option 2 is that repeated taping adds up financially and logistically, whereas a brace provides sustained support with less frequent ongoing costs. By weighing per-use costs, clinician time, and wear-and-tear implications, you can see why the statement in Option 1 is not typically supported by cost analyses over a season.

In summary, the claim that ankle taping is cheaper across a season compared to bracing does not hold under typical athletic program cost structures, where braces tend to offer lower cumulative costs and greater convenience over time.

HTHRHSC 5550 SP2025 (5567) Quiz #2

True or False: Getting your ankles taped is cheaper over a course of a season as compared to ankle bracing.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Identify the bond angle and molecular shape of H2O.

Using Dalton's Atomic theory, explain the following observation. Hint: DO NOT answer with a law! The mass of the products at the end of the reaction was the same as the mass of the reactants at the beginning.

The number of valence electrons in a sulfur atom is 16.

If matter is uniform throughout and can be separated into multiple substances by physical means, it is called a(n) ________________.

Circle the letter for all examples of chemical change. Circle all correct answers.

Which of the following Lewis structures are incorrect? There may be more than one.

For 18O2-, identify each of the followingMass Number

Match each of the following experiments with the main result of the experimental work.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单