Question at position 2 Ichthyosaur was a large aquatic reptile of the Mesozoic, some 150 million years ago. Fossils show that it had a dorsal fin and a tail just as fish do, even though its closest relatives were four-legged terrestrial reptiles that had neither dorsal fins nor aquatic tails. The dorsal fins and tails of ichthyosaurs and fish areanalogous.homologous.examples of genetic drift.vestigial.Clear my selection

Question

Question at position 2 Ichthyosaur was a large aquatic reptile of the Mesozoic, some 150 million years ago. Fossils show that it had a dorsal fin and a tail just as fish do, even though its closest relatives were four-legged terrestrial reptiles that had neither dorsal fins nor aquatic tails. The dorsal fins and tails of ichthyosaurs and fish areanalogous.homologous.examples of genetic drift.vestigial.Clear my selection

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a comparison between a dorsal fin and a tail found in ichthyosaurs and those in fish, asking you to classify their relationship as analogous, homologous, an example of genetic drift, or vestigial.
Option 1: analogous. This is correct. Dorsal fins and aquatic tails in ichthyosaurs and fish serve similar functions (streamlining and propulsion in water) but arose independently in their respective lineages. Their structures did not come from a common ancestral fin, so they are the result of convergent evolution rather than shared ancestry.
Option 2: homologous. This would be true if the fins/tails were inherited from a common ancestor with those same features. However, ichthyosaurs are not closely related to modern fish, and their dorsal fins and tails did not originate from a trait carried down from a common ancestor with fish. The similarity is due to similar needs in an aquatic environment, not shared origin, so this choice is incorrect.
Option 3: examples of genetic drift. Genetic drift refers to random changes in allele frequencies that can affect traits over time, not to the similarity of structures due to function or their evolutionary origin. The dorsal fins/tails’ similarity is best explained by adaptive, convergent evolution, not drift, making this option inaccurate.
Option 4: vestigial. A vestigial trait is one that remains from an ancestral feature that no longer serves its original function. The ichthyosaur fins and tails functioned for aquatic locomotion, so labeling them vestigial is incorrect.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 25 Analogous anatomical structures in two different specieshave similar functions.are derived from the same ancestral structure.were formerly useful, but are now useless.have different functions.Clear my selection

If similarities between two structures in different organisms reflect independent evolution, these structures are :

The wings of a bat and a bird are examples of

Bats and birds are both capable of flight, but their wings have different bone structures. Which statement best supports the relationship between bat and bird wings?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler