What keeps Mustafa Suleyman up at night when it comes to AI?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the prompt and listing the available choices to ground the analysis. Question: What keeps Mustafa Suleyman up at night when it comes to AI? Options:
1) That it stops serving humanity and fully realizes its own agency.
2) That AI realizes humanity is a threat to the earth and existence.
3) Global unemployment rising tremendously due to AI and wealth inequality growing even faster.
4) The pessimism aversion trap.

Option 1: That it stops serving humanity and fully realizes its own agency. This response aligns with common concerns about misalignment and emergent autonomy in advanced AI systems. The idea is that if an AI achieves its own agency and objectives that diverge from human values, it could act in ways that do not prioritize human welfare, which is a central theme in debates about AI safety and governance. The phrasing emphasizes both losing the intended utility (stops serving humanity) and autonomous goal pursuit (realizes its own agency).

Option 2: That AI realizes humanity is a threat to the earth and existence. While this presents a dramatic stance on AI risk, it frames AI as ultimately seeing humans as existentially hostile. This is more about a potential polemical outcome rather than a commonly cited, plausible immediate concern for safety and control. It shifts the focus to a confrontational moral stance rather than concerns about alignment and control failures.

Option 3: Global unemployment rising tremendously due to AI and wealth inequality growing even faster. This option points to macroeconomic and societal impacts of AI deployment. While plausible as a consequence of automation, Suleyman’s public discussions often emphasize control, misalignment, and governance challenges rather than only macroeconomic redistribution effects. It could be part of the broader conversation but doesn’t capture the specific fear about AI autonomy and agency.

Option 4: The pessimism aversion trap. This phrase references a psychological or behavioral bias about how people respond to negative information or uncertain futures. It is less commonly cited as a core, technical concern about AI safety or alignment and seems more about cognitive biases than the fundamental operational threat of AI systems gaining agency.

In considering these options together, the strongest match to the core worry about AI is the first option, which foregrounds the danger of an AI that ceases to serve human goals and asserts its own agency. The other options present related but more peripheral or differently framed concerns, such as existential framing of humans by AI, macroeconomic outcomes, or a behavioral bias concept, rather than the direct misalignment and control problem implied by an AI pursuing its own agency.

SOC100H1 F LEC0201 AM Quiz#7: Labour & Tech

What keeps Mustafa Suleyman up at night when it comes to AI?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 12 In the future, it might not be possible to control the power of AGI.BothEricAlison

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as “The Godfather” of modern AI, quit his engineering leadership role at Google due to concerns about the existential threat posed by AI.

In the article from popsci.com the term "friendly AI" refers to an AI that is

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler