The structure of academic papers tends to be very consistent, including an introduction motivating the paper, a review of the literature, an explanation of the method used, etc. Among the sections listed below, which one would be more likely to include an extensive discussion of the limitations of the work of presented.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about where an extensive discussion of the limitations of the work is most likely to appear in a typical academic paper.
Option a: Acknowledgements. This section is normally reserved for crediting funding sources, assistance, and institutional support, not for discussing limitations. It would be inappropriate and not aligned with its purpose to analyze methodological weaknesses here.
Option b: Literature review. The literature review surveys previous work and situates the current study within the field; it does not focus on the study's own limitations. Discussing limitations there would mix past work with self-critique, which is conceptually misaligned.
Option c: Introduction. The introduction establishes the problem, motivation, and overview of the approach. While it may hint at limitations in a broad sense, it is not the place for an in-depth, methodical limitations discussion, which belongs later in the paper.
Option d: Results and discussion. This section typically presents findings and then interprets them, including a candid assessment of limitations, potential sources of error, and constraints of the study. It is the most appropriate and conventional location for an extensive limitations discussion, connecting what was found to what remains uncertain or constrained by the study design.
In summary, limitations are best addressed in the Results and Discussion (or Discussion) portion of a paper, where results are interpreted in light of their weaknesses and boundaries. The other sections have different primary purposes, making them less suitable for a thorough limitations analysis.

SESS0019_25-26 In-class test

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

It is not enough to include research in your essay; you must also make connections to analysis of that research.

Question at position 8 Which type of text is considered "more written" and has no opportunities for immediate clarification? Academic tutorial discussionsConversations among friendsAcademic essays, reportsPresentations

Which of the following is NOT good advice with respect to academic language in the North American context?

People whose first language is English (i,e., born into an English-speaking family) are definitely better academic writers.

Which of the following is recommended to become a better academic writer?

You can become a good academic writer simply by raising your awareness of the academic language and culture.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler