The structure of academic papers tends to be very consistent, including an introduction motivating the paper, a review of the literature, an explanation of the method used, etc. Among the sections listed below, which one would be more likely to include an extensive discussion of the limitations of the work of presented.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which section of an academic paper is most likely to include an extensive discussion of the limitations of the work presented.
Option a) Introduction: This section typically motivates the study, outlines the problem, and states aims or hypotheses, but it does not usually dwell on the study's limitations.
Option b) Results and discussion: This is the part where the authors present findings and interpret them, often including a thorough discussion of limitations, potential biases, uncertainties, and scope of generalizability to acknowledge what the study cannot claim.
Option c) Acknowledgements: This section is reserved for thanking people, funding sources, and those who contributed intellectually or technically but not for detailing limitations of the work.
Option d) Literature review: This part surveys prior work to set the context and justify the study; it does not typically focus on the current work’s limitations.

In short, limitations are most appropriately addressed in the Results and Discussion section because that is where the authors critically appraise their findings, discuss constraints, methodological caveats, and the boundaries of applicability. The other sections serve different purposes (motivation, gratitude, and situating the work within existing research) and are not typically the primary locus for a comprehensive limitations discussion.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

It is not enough to include research in your essay; you must also make connections to analysis of that research.

Question at position 8 Which type of text is considered "more written" and has no opportunities for immediate clarification? Academic tutorial discussionsConversations among friendsAcademic essays, reportsPresentations

Which of the following is NOT good advice with respect to academic language in the North American context?

People whose first language is English (i,e., born into an English-speaking family) are definitely better academic writers.

Which of the following is recommended to become a better academic writer?

You can become a good academic writer simply by raising your awareness of the academic language and culture.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler