Which form of academic misconduct did Guiren commit?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let's restate the question and the available options to ensure clarity about what we are evaluating.
Question: Which form of academic misconduct did Guiren commit?
Options:
- Cheating on an exam
- Claiming ownership of someone else's work (plagiarism)
- Handing in the same assignment in more than one course
- Presenting falsified or invented data

Now, evaluate each option in light of common definitions of academic misconduct:
Option 1: Cheating on an exam. This typically involves actions like looking at another student's answers, using unauthorized aids, or other forms of dishonesty during an exam. Unless there is information indicating such behavior by Guiren, this option cannot be assumed to be the misconduct in question.
Option 2: Claiming ownership of someone else’s work (plagiarism). Plagiarism involves presenting another person’s ideas or work as one’s own. If Guiren had copied or improperly credited sources, this would apply, but the given clue specifies a different form of misconduct, so this may not be the correct classification here.
Option 3: Handing in the same assignment in more than one course. This is known as self-plagiarism or double submission. It is a form of misconduct in some academic settings, but it is distinct from fabricating or altering data. If the incident involved reusing work rather than fabricating data, this would be the issue; however, the clue points away from duplication and toward data integrity concerns.
Option 4: Presenting falsified or invented data. This refers to fabricating data, altering results, or inventing information to support conclusions. This is a serious breach of research integrity and directly concerns the veracity of data presented in work.

Considering these interpretations, the option that aligns with fabricating or inventing data directly corresponds to a data integrity violation. The other options describe different misconduct types (exam dishonesty, plagiarism, or double submission) that do not address data fabrication.

In summary, when evaluating forms of academic misconduct, presenting falsified or invented data stands out as a distinctive violation of research integrity, whereas the other listed options refer to different unethical behaviors. The reasoning for selecting this option hinges on the explicit emphasis on data fabrication rather than exam cheating, plagiarism, or duplicate submissions.

Which form of academic misconduct did Guiren commit?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

If I am called into a meeting to discuss academic misconduct I can:

As a penalty of Academic Misconduct at La Trobe University you could:

The role of the Student Academic Misconduct Committee is to:

The Academic Integrity Advisor investigates claims of academic misconduct.

If an Academic Misconduct is proven, and its the first time this has happened to me, how will this affect my grade and future studies? Please select all that apply

Which of the following are types of academic misconduct? Please select all that apply

Includes intentionally helping another to engage in an act of academic misconduct, or attempts thereof.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler