True or False. You are responsible for the work submitted on a group assignment if your name is on the paper, even if you yourself didn’t commit an honor code violation?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement asks about responsibility for work submitted on a group assignment when your name appears on the paper, even if you did not commit an honor code violation.

Consider the principle of accountability in group work: when a student’s name is on a submission, instructors and honor codes often hold all listed authors responsible for the content and integrity of the work. This means that if misconduct is alleged or findings of a violation occur, each person whose name appears on the paper can be implicated, even if they did not personally participate in the violation.

This framing emphasizes collective responsibility: the presence of a name signals endorsement and authorship of the submitted work, and universities commonly treat group collaborations as a shared accountability unit for ensuring honesty, accuracy, and proper attribution.

However, in many codes of conduct, there can be distinctions between deliberate violations and inadvertent errors, and there may be processes to investigate individual involvement. If a student did not contribute to the violation and can demonstrate lack of involvement, some institutions allow for differentiation during the assessment of responsibility.

Why this statement is considered true: the safety net of collective accountability ensures that instructors have a clear basis to evaluate the integrity of the submitted work as a whole and discourages free riding where some group members rely on others to carry out the wrongdoing. It reinforces the expectation that all listed authors share responsibility for the submission’s content.

Why this statement could be misunderstood if not nuanced: it does not mean every aspect of the violation is automatically attributed to every author in every case. Depending on policy, there may be investigations to determine individual participation or intent, and appropriate actions can target specific individuals if justified. Nonetheless, the general rule in many academic honor-code contexts is that you are responsible when your name appears on the work, regardless of whether you personally committed a violation.

Academic 2024 Lesson 4 Quiz

True or False. You are responsible for the work submitted on a group assignment if your name is on the paper, even if you yourself didn’t commit an honor code violation?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I have read the Academic Integrity section in the Art 8 syllabus and agree to follow it throughout the course.

Please click "true" to accept the Rutgers University Honor Pledge: “On my honor, I have neither received nor given any unauthorized assistance on this examination or assignment.”

If you are caught cheating or engaging in academic misconduct, an educational sanction means that...

What will happen if I do ANYTHING that APPEARS to be an academic integrity violation during a Quiz/exam, including look at my phone, whisper to my friend, look at my friends laptop (pointless), look at my notes/papers/book/backpack?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler