您认为大学为什么反对这种行为？

Question

您认为大学为什么反对这种行为？

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: You are asked why universities oppose this behavior. The answer options present several potential criticisms, and the provided answer indicates 'All of the above'.
Option 1: 'It阻碍学生学会从其他角度看待问题' translates to 'It hinders students from learning to view problems from other perspectives.' If students are exposed to a single approach or flow of thought, they may develop cognitive rigidity and miss alternative viewpoints, which is a concern in higher education that aims to foster critical thinking and versatility.
Option 2: 'It gives some students unfair academic advantage over other students because they have already received feedback on their work' suggests that prior feedback can create an uneven playing field. When certain students benefit from early guidance or established feedback loops, others may be disadvantaged by having to start from a less informed position, undermining fairness in assessment.
Option 3: 'It prevents students from developing the kind of deep and broad knowledge of their chosen field of study that employers expect University of Sydney graduates to have' posits that overemphasis on speed, superficial tasks, or narrow tasks could limit the breadth and depth of learning. Employers often value transferable, well-rounded knowledge and the ability to synthesize across topics, which can be compromised if the behavior narrows study focus.
Option 4: 'All of the above' claims that each of the preceding points is valid and contributes to the overall objection to the behavior. If each of the first three statements holds true in some contexts, combining them into a single critique captures the comprehensive impact on learning quality, fairness, and outcomes.
Synthesis: Since each individual critique highlights a distinct way the behavior could be detrimental—cognitive flexibility, fairness in feedback, and depth/breadth of knowledge—the 'All of the above' option logically encompasses all these concerns. Therefore, considering the typical aims of university education to cultivate critical thinking, equity, and robust mastery, the composite critique is coherent and plausible.
Note on potential misconceptions: If one interpreted the behavior as benign or purely beneficial in one domain, they might overlook issues of fairness and educational breadth. Understanding the interplay of perspective-taking, equitable evaluation, and comprehensive knowledge helps clarify why multiple concerns are cited together, supporting the 'All of the above' rationale.

2025_UNIV_AHEM 模块 2 场景：相同，相同但不同

您认为大学为什么反对这种行为？

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I have read the Academic Integrity section in the Art 8 syllabus and agree to follow it throughout the course.

Please click "true" to accept the Rutgers University Honor Pledge: “On my honor, I have neither received nor given any unauthorized assistance on this examination or assignment.”

If you are caught cheating or engaging in academic misconduct, an educational sanction means that...

What will happen if I do ANYTHING that APPEARS to be an academic integrity violation during a Quiz/exam, including look at my phone, whisper to my friend, look at my friends laptop (pointless), look at my notes/papers/book/backpack?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler