If my friend and I work on homework together and split the questions in half, this is not considered plagiarism because we agreed beforehand.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks us to evaluate a claim about plagiarism in a specific scenario. 
First, consider the idea that simply agreeing beforehand to split questions and work together automatically makes the act non-plagiaristic. In practice, collaboration policies vary: some instructors permit collaboration, while others require individual work or explicit permission for sharing answers. Merely agreeing does not universally exempt the work from plagiarism concerns; it depends on the assignment rules and how the final submitted work is presented. 
Next, assess the core concept of plagiarism itself. Plagiarism involves presenting someone else’s ideas or work as your own without proper attribution or permission. If you and your friend truly split the questions and then submit your own portions as your own independent work, there is still a risk of violating policy if the instructor requires solo work or if the final submission conceals collaboration. 
Then, examine the practical implications of “splitting questions in half.” This could lead to issues such as unequal contribution, potential confusion about which parts are original work, and possible misattribution if one person uses the other's responses without proper quotation or citation when required. 
Additionally, even with an upfront agreement, there can be expectations about originality, formatting, or how sources are cited. If the agreement does not align with the course rules, the action might still be considered academically dishonest. 
Finally, consider the broader teaching goal: ensuring that collaboration aligns with guidelines and that each student demonstrates understanding. When the policy prohibits sharing answers or when the assignment is intended to be completed individually, the described scenario could still constitute a violation regardless of prior agreement. 
In summary, the claim that this arrangement is not plagiarism simply because there was an agreement beforehand is not universally true; it depends on the course policy and how the final work is submitted. If the policy requires independent work or prohibits sharing answers, the statement would be false. If the policy explicitly permits collaborative work and the final submissions clearly reflect each person’s own contributions, then it could be acceptable. Since the question presents a blanket claim, the safer and more general conclusion is that agreement alone does not guarantee freedom from plagiarism concerns.

CC-100-24 Part 1: What is Plagiarism/Nature of Plagiarism

If my friend and I work on homework together and split the questions in half, this is not considered plagiarism because we agreed beforehand.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I have read the Academic Integrity section in the Art 8 syllabus and agree to follow it throughout the course.

Please click "true" to accept the Rutgers University Honor Pledge: “On my honor, I have neither received nor given any unauthorized assistance on this examination or assignment.”

If you are caught cheating or engaging in academic misconduct, an educational sanction means that...

What will happen if I do ANYTHING that APPEARS to be an academic integrity violation during a Quiz/exam, including look at my phone, whisper to my friend, look at my friends laptop (pointless), look at my notes/papers/book/backpack?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler