Which of these statements does not align with the UOW approach to academic integrity, as stated in the Principles section of the Academic Integrity Policy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the core question helps orient the analysis: which statement does not align with the UOW approach to academic integrity as described in the Principles section of the Academic Integrity Policy?
Option a: 'UOW is committed to providing an educational approach to academic integrity.' This aligns with the policy’s emphasis on education and ongoing learning about integrity rather than relying on punitive measures alone.
Option b: 'UOW will respond to academic misconduct in a fair, consistent, transparent and timely manner.' This reflects the expected procedural rigor: fairness, consistency, transparency, and timeliness are typical principles in integrity policies.
Option c: 'UOW will ensure a continuous cycle of quality improvement to monitor the occurrence and nature of instances of academic misconduct and take action to address underlying causes.' This portrays a proactive, data-informed approach aimed at prevention and improvement, which is consistent with integrity policies that emphasize assessment and root-cause action.
Option d: 'UOW believes that all students have been taught about about academic integrity before starting their university studies, so they do not need to be taught about it any further.' This statement suggests a one-time, foundational training assumption and a cessation of ongoing education, which contradicts the policy’s likely stance on ongoing education, refreshers, and reinforcement of integrity concepts throughout the student journey.
Now evaluating each option in terms of alignment with the stated Principles:
- For option a, the educational approach to integrity is a common and recommended stance: it emphasizes teaching and developing understanding rather than relying solely on punitive responses. This makes sense as aligned with the Principles.
- For option b, a fair, consistent, transparent, and timely response is a standard principle in integrity policies, ensuring due process and trust in the process. This is aligned.
- For option c, continuous quality improvement, monitoring, and addressing underlying causes reflect a commitment to prevention and organizational learning, which is in line with robust integrity governance.
- For option d, the claim that all students have already been taught and thus no further teaching is needed undermines the ongoing, repetitive education and reinforcement that integrity policies typically require. It diminishes current students’ need for continual awareness and updates, making it the outlier.
Across the options, the misalignment is clear in option d: it implies no need for ongoing education, which is contrary to most integrity frameworks that promote continuous education and reinforcement.
In summary, option a describes a constructive educational stance, option b covers fair and transparent conduct, option c highlights ongoing improvement, while option d asserts a one-time, complete teaching event and no further education, which does not align with the principles typically outlined in an Academic Integrity Policy.

Dashboard Acknowledge Quiz

Which of these statements does not align with the UOW approach to academic integrity, as stated in the Principles section of the Academic Integrity Policy?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I can submit work from a different class to fulfill course requirements without engaging in academic misconduct.

Allowing others to complete paper assignments, whether it is paid or not, counts as cheating.

I agree to abide by Pacific's Honor Code before beginning this exam.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Repeated instances of plagiarism can result in failure in the course and expulsion from the college.

I acknowledge and agree to uphold the BYU CE Academic Integrity Policy and all exam rules and proctoring guidelines.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler