A faculty member who catches a student cheating in class is permitted to assign a grade of zero on the assignment without completing/submitting an academic integrity violation form.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating the statement, I consider what typical academic integrity policies require for handling cheating incidents.
Option 1: 'True' — The claim that a faculty member may assign a grade of zero on the assignment without completing or submitting an academic integrity violation form suggests two things: immediate grading action and the absence of formal reporting. Often, institutions permit or even expect some form of formal documentation or reporting to an academic integrity office before or alongside sanctions. This makes the statement suspicious as a universal rule, since policies vary by institution but commonly include a formal process.
Option 2: 'False' — The assertion that a faculty member is permitted to assign a zero without submitting the integrity form contradicts the idea that formal procedures accompany violations. Since many schools require documentation or a formal integrity report to ensure due process, this option aligns with standard expectations that a form or report is part of sanctioning, not optional. The reasoning rests on the distinction between immediate grading decisions and procedural compliance; a zero may be justified, but typically within the bounds of a documented process.
In terms of potential misconceptions, option 1 might be appealing if someone assumes grading authority is entirely separate from integrity processes, but that ignores the administrative safeguards designed to prevent arbitrary sanctions. Option 2 requires recognizing that formal documentation is a common component of handling alleged misconduct, not merely an administrative burden.
Additionally, one should consider that some situations might allow for immediate grade reductions for cheating while still initiating the integrity process, but the core policy expectation is that a formal form is involved as part of proper procedure, which makes the precise universal allowance claimed by option 1 unlikely.
Overall, the evaluation hinges on understanding that formal integrity procedures are typically tied to sanctions, and therefore the blanket statement in option 1 is not consistent with standard practice, while option 2 reflects the idea that the process (including a form) is an essential part of the action taken.

CMPSC 132 Spring 2025 EECS Academic Integrity Quiz

A faculty member who catches a student cheating in class is permitted to assign a grade of zero on the assignment without completing/submitting an academic integrity violation form.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I can submit work from a different class to fulfill course requirements without engaging in academic misconduct.

Allowing others to complete paper assignments, whether it is paid or not, counts as cheating.

I agree to abide by Pacific's Honor Code before beginning this exam.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Repeated instances of plagiarism can result in failure in the course and expulsion from the college.

I acknowledge and agree to uphold the BYU CE Academic Integrity Policy and all exam rules and proctoring guidelines.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler