Did Laura and Becky violate the Academic Integrity Policy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question: Did Laura and Becky violate the Academic Integrity Policy?

Option 1: Yes. You should never talk to other students about your work.
- This statement presents an absolute rule that is not accurate in all contexts. Collaborating or discussing concepts can be appropriate, but sharing or copying specific work or ideas without proper attribution can violate integrity policies. The claim as written is too broad and overlooks nuances about allowed collaboration and proper citation.

Option 2: No. Laura and Becky did their own work and turned in different papers.
- This option asserts that each student produced their own work and submitted distinct papers, which aligns with typical standards of academic integrity. If their papers are indeed original and not plagiarized or improperly shared, this supports a non-violation scenario. The emphasis on individuality and originality is key to evaluating integrity.

Option 3: No. It’s impossible to plagiarize literature papers; they always represent your own opinion.
- This is incorrect for several reasons. Plagiarism involves presenting someone else’s work or ideas as your own, regardless of the subject. Literature papers often rely on sources, quotations, and established analyses, and failing to cite them properly constitutes plagiarism. The claim that literature papers can’t be plagiarized is false.

Option 4: Yes. Laura and Becky basically wrote the same paper.
- If the two papers were substantially identical or closely copied, this would likely indicate a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy due to plagiarism or collusion. The wording suggests a strong overlap, which would undermine individual authorship and integrity requirements. This option highlights a scenario that would raise red flags about misconduct.

Overall, evaluating each option involves considering whether collaboration, copying, or failure to attribute sources occurred, and recognizing that absolute statements (as in options 1 and 3) are generally misleading in real academic policy contexts. Line breaks are included to improve readability and separate the distinct reasoning paths for each choice.

AITUT_AY2526_TUT4 Scenario | Laura's and Becky's Papers

Did Laura and Becky violate the Academic Integrity Policy?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I can submit work from a different class to fulfill course requirements without engaging in academic misconduct.

Allowing others to complete paper assignments, whether it is paid or not, counts as cheating.

I agree to abide by Pacific's Honor Code before beginning this exam.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Repeated instances of plagiarism can result in failure in the course and expulsion from the college.

I acknowledge and agree to uphold the BYU CE Academic Integrity Policy and all exam rules and proctoring guidelines.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler