Did Eve violate academic integrity standards?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks whether Eve violated academic integrity standards. We will evaluate each option in turn to understand why some are plausible and others are not.
Option 1: 'No. Eve was using a translation tool, which is no different than using spell or grammar check in Word. So the work she submitted was really her own.' This claim equates translation tools with simple spell/grammar checks and assumes they do not alter the author’s work. In most academic integrity policies, translation tools can be considered unauthorized assistance if they produce or substantially translate content that is not the student’s own work, or if the tool alters the cognitive process of completing the assessment. Therefore, this statement mischaracterizes common standards and is likely false.
Option 2: 'Yes. Eve used an unauthorized aid to complete the exam.' This statement directly asserts that an aid was used without authorization. If the translation tool was not permitted by the instructor or the exam rules, using it would constitute a violation of academic integrity. This aligns with standard policies that prohibit unauthorized assistance and external resources during an assessment. This option accurately reflects a violation scenario when an aid is used against explicit or implicit prohibitions.
Option 3: 'No. The instructor did not explicitly prohibit the use of on-line translation programs.' Even if there were no explicit prohibition, many institutions rely on overarching policies about independent work and appropriate use of external resources. The absence of explicit prohibition does not automatically render such use permissible, and leveraging a tool that can substantially change the output may still violate integrity standards depending on policy, timing, and instructions. Thus this claim is too permissive and not reliably correct.
Option 4: 'No. Eve studied for the exam, knew her material, and hadn’t planned to use the translation site.' This argument focuses on Eve’s intentions and perceived preparedness, but intent does not automatically absolve action that constitutes unauthorized assistance. If she did use a translation tool during the exam, that would typically still be considered a violation regardless of study history or planning. Therefore this option is not a robust defense against a violation claim.

AITUT_AY2526_TUT4 Scenario | Eve's Take-Home Exam

Did Eve violate academic integrity standards?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I can submit work from a different class to fulfill course requirements without engaging in academic misconduct.

Allowing others to complete paper assignments, whether it is paid or not, counts as cheating.

I agree to abide by Pacific's Honor Code before beginning this exam.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Cheating on the placement assessment could result in enrollment into a course that is too difficult, or not challenging enough, potentially costing time and money.

Repeated instances of plagiarism can result in failure in the course and expulsion from the college.

I acknowledge and agree to uphold the BYU CE Academic Integrity Policy and all exam rules and proctoring guidelines.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler