ECON 102 is a class in which I am free to express my personal opinion, if that opinion makes other people feel bad about themselves then that is their problem and not mine.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a statement and asks whether it is true or false. Here are the two options analyzed separately to build understanding.
Option 1: True. This would claim that in ECON 102 a student’s personal opinion can be expressed freely, and if such an opinion makes others feel bad, that impact is solely the other people’s problem. This line of thinking ignores important classroom norms and policies about harassment, respectful discourse, and the potential impact of communicative behavior on peers. In many college settings, expressing opinions that demean, belittle, or target others can violate codes of conduct or course expectations, regardless of intent. Therefore labeling the statement as universally true overlooks the responsibility to maintain a respectful learning environment and may misstate the balance between free expression and a safe, inclusive classroom.
Option 2: False. This asserts that the claim in the prompt is not correct as stated. In a typical ECON 102 course (or most college courses), students are expected to engage in respectful dialogue and to recognize that expressing opinions can affect others in the room. The instructor and the institution usually emphasize that freedom of expression does not excuse behavior that harms or intimidates classmates. Thus the idea that “if that opinion makes others feel bad then that is their problem” is inconsistent with standard policies on respectful conduct and with educational norms that promote constructive discussion. Consequently, this option aligns with the idea that the statement is not acceptable as stated.
Additional nuance: even if the opinion is personally held, the manner and context of expressing it can be subject to moderation or correction to prevent harassment or harm. Understanding this helps students distinguish between permissible debate and harmful rhetoric, and it reinforces the expectation of responsibility in academic discourse.
In summary, the reasoning shows that the claim is not correct because it fails to account for the broader standards of respectful communication and the responsibilities of participants in a learning environment. The alternate choice reflects the realistic guidance that opinions should be engaged with thoughtfully and without targeting or harming others.

ECON_V 102 004 2024W2 Quiz: Respectful Environment

ECON 102 is a class in which I am free to express my personal opinion, if that opinion makes other people feel bad about themselves then that is their problem and not mine.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler